hrudu.

just another maniac monday.

| 13 Comments

Post to Twitter

… Or, more apt, just another manyak Monday.

13_08_2007_0215663001186986925_idelicious_ili_lesja_chernish

So.  Who really are the sexual aggressors?  The males (oh, hey I’m going to try being scientific!) who ogle the females, or the females who dress provocatively?  (Inviting ogling, of course!)

Why would females dress provocatively anyway — if only to invite stares/attention?  For what purpose?  To possibly attract a mate?

Interestingly enough, human females are the ones who change their aesthetic appearance in order to attract a mate, but in the animal kingdom, its the males who do the tapdancing.  This hits its peak before her period.  Roughly translated, during these periods (no pun intended), women tend to like the attention, and one of their ways of getting it happens to be dressing provocatively.

That’s not saying that women in relationships would stop making themselves beautiful — vanity, I guess is too big for my research for now.  (research = a coupla minutes Googling.)  Anyone care to enlighten me on this one?

To answer why: it’s because in our (or from where I’m from) society, girls CANNOT directly get what they want.  So maybe they fancy a member of the male species — most females can’t just go up to a male and ask him out.  (Although that’d be cool too!) So what do they do to maybe make the males come to them?  Improve their physical appearance.

— And what do the men do in return?  Use their hunter/caveman instincts to lock in on something that moves — the provocatively-dressed females!

It appears we have a chicken-egg-chicken situation.  Who started it?  :D

***

Can anyone from the female species confirm this?  Comments?  That’d be awesome.  :D

***

“God, Dear Me. Ladies. God Bless ‘Em. What would we do without them? With their ways? Their..their mysterious seasons. The moon. Glenn Close. Sheena Easton. All the different kinds of women. Oh. Smashing!”

-Moss, The I.T. Crowd

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Related posts:

  1. relating: objectivity and subjectivity.
  2. relationshit talk.
  3. roots and going in circles.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

  • http://micamyx.com/ Micamyx

    Partly true. Wait, you somewhat inspired me to write a blog entry about this haha :P
    .-= Micamyx´s last blog ..BebeCaiz’ Pinkish Birthday =-.

  • http://micamyx.com Micamyx

    Partly true. Wait, you somewhat inspired me to write a blog entry about this haha :P
    .-= Micamyx´s last blog ..BebeCaiz’ Pinkish Birthday =-.

  • http://titakosivilma.com/ ven

    does this apply to male – female dynamics lang? pano pag obit?

  • http://titakosivilma.com ven

    does this apply to male – female dynamics lang? pano pag obit?

  • paolo.

    @Micamyx: Thanks! I got inspired to write this after being called “manyak” on a Monday morning, LOL! I was just using my eyes! :D

    @ven: Aha! Haven’t even thought of that. Baka nagcocompensate yung extra testosterone nung homme(?), so parang male-female parin? :)

  • paolo.

    @Micamyx: Thanks! I got inspired to write this after being called “manyak” on a Monday morning, LOL! I was just using my eyes! :D

    @ven: Aha! Haven’t even thought of that. Baka nagcocompensate yung extra testosterone nung homme(?), so parang male-female parin? :)

  • marj

    Your question: “So. Who really are the sexual aggressors?”

    Coming form a technical point of view, I think you’ve already answered that question in this post.
    Aggressors are those who initiate action– the instigators.

    And you said: “And what do the men do in return? Use their hunter/caveman instincts to lock in on something that moves — the provocatively-dressed females!” Men take action.

    “most females can’t just go up to a male and ask him out. (Although that’d be cool too!) So what do they do to maybe make the males come to them? Improve their physical appearance.”

    Clearly, women are the receiver of the action. They dress provocatively just to “provoke” ( to incite action/reaction they need or want; to get attention).

    What if you just use the word “manyak” instead of “aggressors”? I think that is more neutral… :D

  • marj

    Your question: “So. Who really are the sexual aggressors?”

    Coming form a technical point of view, I think you’ve already answered that question in this post.
    Aggressors are those who initiate action– the instigators.

    And you said: “And what do the men do in return? Use their hunter/caveman instincts to lock in on something that moves — the provocatively-dressed females!” Men take action.

    “most females can’t just go up to a male and ask him out. (Although that’d be cool too!) So what do they do to maybe make the males come to them? Improve their physical appearance.”

    Clearly, women are the receiver of the action. They dress provocatively just to “provoke” ( to incite action/reaction they need or want; to get attention).

    What if you just use the word “manyak” instead of “aggressors”? I think that is more neutral… :D

  • Hui

    Provoking is an action. rofl

  • Hui

    Provoking is an action. rofl

  • http://bluerlyn.com/ eRLyN

    somewhat true i would say.
    .-= eRLyN´s last blog ..Tips for an Easy Christmas Shopping =-.

  • http://bluerlyn.com eRLyN

    somewhat true i would say.
    .-= eRLyN´s last blog ..Tips for an Easy Christmas Shopping =-.

  • Pingback: updated! | your mind will go pi. | hrudu.